The Perjury, The Court, and The Silenced Speech
The Lie That Killed A Business
Case 254900948 | **Second Judicial District Court, Weber County, Ogden, Utah.**
This document serves as an **Independent Review of Judicial and Procedural Failures**, based solely on the public record and documented evidence. It details how a protective order, built on **provable perjury** and **procedural sabotage**, was used to **censor free speech** and **destroy a citizen's business**. The case of Lueders v. Thompson reveals a systemic judicial failure where the court ignored objective evidence, denied due process, and enabled a miscarriage of justice orchestrated by Petitioner’s attorney, **Ron W. Haycock, Jr., of the Strong & Hanni Law Firm**.
Read The Full Story →Evidence of Fraud & Sabotage
The 30-Minute Due Process Trap
Mr. Thompson argued for a **30-minute hearing** to present his voluminous evidence. The Judge agreed but then consumed a significant portion of that time with his own questions, leaving Thompson with only **~17 minutes of net defense time**—a fatal denial of due process.
Call Volume: A Contradiction of Fear
The court found harassment despite objective data showing the Petitioner initiated far more contact, undermining any claim of "reasonable fear."
The Five Houses Down Perjury
The Judge's finding against Jacob Thompson's credibility rested on a sworn allegation of stalking. This claim was a provably fabricated lie, weaponized in court by the Petitioner's attorney.
- **Objective GPS Data:** Unrefuted GPS data proves Mr. Thompson was at his own home.
- **Courtroom Defamation Proof:** Immediately following the hearing, the Petitioner’s father verbally assaulted Mr. Thompson **in the courtroom**, calling him a "piece of shit," proving the Petitioner was actively **smearing him** outside the court record.
- **Intentional Deception:** The "five houses down" comment was a private ruse, twisted into a false stalking allegation.
The Attack on Creative Expression
The court censored Mr. Thompson's artistic work by ignoring its explicit title and metaphorical intent.
- **Weaponizing Metaphor:** The attorney convinced the court to treat the phrase "**You have blood on your hands**" (an accusation of culpability) as a physical threat.
- **Exaggerated Threat (The Song):** The lyric, "**The truth is like a bullet**," was wildly exaggerated by the opposing counsel to imply a threat of mass violence.
The Weaponization of the Ban
The final order imposed an overexpanded, ill-defined **"all weapons" ban**, a penalty grossly disproportionate to the crime.
- **No Crime Alleged:** The Petitioner admitted her fear was **speculative** and did not allege physical assault.
- **Overreach:** The Commissioner illegally expanded a limited ban to "all weapons," directly eliminating Mr. Thompson's livelihood.
Institutional Failure & Procedural Sabotage
The Judge affirmed he **listened to the entire prior Commissioner's hearing**, placing him on explicit notice that the original Petition was built on weak claims. Despite this, the court still proceeded to rule against the truth.
Mr. Thompson requested, and the Judge **explicitly agreed** to grant, a **full evidentiary hearing** (a half-day commitment) before making any final finding. In violation of his own agreement and the requirement for due process, the Judge initially offered only **20 minutes** for the entire defense. The resulting, severe time restriction was a **calculated tactical maneuver** that forced Mr. Thompson to lose precious minutes frantically attempting to re-prioritize and locate evidence, guaranteeing his defense would be disoriented and incomplete before the final, premature ruling was made.
The rejection of Mr. Thompson's vital **Rule 60(b) Motion** was not a clerical mistake but a **deliberate act of sabotage orchestrated by Ron W. Haycock, Jr.**, who improperly intervened to argue it should be rejected. This action resulted in the motion being held **hostage**, blocking Mr. Thompson from obtaining a final, appealable order.
The Ultimate Irony of Justice
Business Annihilated by Judicial Overreach
The final court order imposed an overexpanded, ill-defined **"all weapons" ban** on Mr. Thompson. This ban, based on speculative fear and judicial error, directly targeted and destroyed his legitimate business, **Spartan Tactical (Titan LLC)**.
The Principled Stand Against Corruption
Mr. Thompson maintains a principled stance: he is **morally refusing to hire an attorney,** insisting that the **undeniable facts and truth of the case should be sufficient to prevail** in an American court of law. He is demanding that the courts uphold the law impartially, not just for those who can afford legal defense. He is now forced to spend all his time and energy **learning complex procedural law just to teach the courts and opposing counsel the rules they violated**, resulting in complete economic and professional paralysis.
